From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bannister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 16, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the screwdrivers which were seized pursuant to a search incident to his lawful arrest (see, Chimel v California, 395 U.S. 752, 762-763). In addition, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress statements given by him to the police since these statements were not the fruits of an unlawful arrest (see, Wong Sun v United States, 371 U.S. 471, 485).

The defendant's remaining contention has not been preserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bannister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Bannister

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME BANNISTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Day

Following the complainant's unequivocal identification of the defendant, there was probable cause to arrest…