From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-26

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert BALEY, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Andrew Dykens on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Andrew Dykens on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed January 25, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

A defendant who has validly waived the right to appeal cannot invoke this Court's interest of justice jurisdiction to obtain a reduced sentence ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145). Here, however, the Court is not precluded from exercising its interest of justice jurisdiction because the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. The record does not demonstrate that the defendant “grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature of the right he was forgoing” ( People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645;see People v. Grant, 83 A.D.3d 862, 862–863, 921 N.Y.S.2d 285;cf. People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222). Therefore, “notwithstanding the written appeal waiver form, it cannot be said that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal” ( People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d at 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645;see People v. Elmer, 19 N.Y.3d 501, 510, 950 N.Y.S.2d 77, 973 N.E.2d 172;People v. Vasquez, 101 A.D.3d 1054, 956 N.Y.S.2d 171).

Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675). ENG, P.J., MASTRO, DICKERSON, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Baley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Baley

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert BALEY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 26, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
114 A.D.3d 959
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1335

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Although the defendant signed a written waiver of the right to appeal, the court never elicited from the…