From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baker

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
May 10, 2024
209 N.Y.S.3d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

05-10-2024

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL),. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MINDY F. VANLEUVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered March 3, 2021. The judg- ment convicted defendant, upon a guilty plea, of manslaughter in the first degree.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL),. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MINDY F. VANLEUVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, OGDEN, NOWAK, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [4]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v. Seay, 201 A.D.3d 1361, 1361-1362, 158 N.Y.S.3d 697 [4th Dept. 2022]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Baker

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
May 10, 2024
209 N.Y.S.3d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

People v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel BAKER…

Court:New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Date published: May 10, 2024

Citations

209 N.Y.S.3d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)