From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and a new trial is ordered.


In the instant trial involving the defendant and a codefendant, the court erred in failing to instruct the jury to consider the evidence of guilt or innocence separately as to each individual (see, CPL 300.10; People v. Parker, 178 A.D.2d 665). This error was compounded by the failure of the trial court to properly charge accomplice liability (see, People v. Ortiz, 107 A.D.2d 824; People v. Vasquez, 104 A.D.2d 429).

In view of our decision, we do not reach the other issues raised by the defendant.

O'Brien, J.P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL BAILEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 351

Citing Cases

People v. Robinson, Gesman

However, in this case involving the defendant and a codefendant, the court erred in failing to instruct the…