From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 1994
201 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Harris, J.).


Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of the crime of rape in the first degree and subsequently sentenced as a second felony offender to 12 1/2 to 25 years' imprisonment. We find no merit to defendant's contention that Supreme Court denied him a fair trial by unnecessarily intruding upon the functions of counsel. Further, we find no merit in defendant's argument that Supreme Court should have more thoroughly questioned jurors after it was discovered that one juror had taken notes of Supreme Court's supplemental charge to the jury, given that defense counsel was allowed an opportunity to request further questioning and declined to do so. In any event, the record establishes that Supreme Court's exploration of the issue was adequate. Finally, we find that the presentence report provided to Supreme Court prior to sentencing was sufficiently complete to satisfy the requirements of CPL 390.20 and, given defendant's criminal record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed. We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 1994
201 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER M. BAILEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 891