Opinion
July 13, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.).
In 1983, defendant was sentenced to two consecutive five-year periods of probation for his convictions under indictments Nos. 62/82 and 965/82. In 1986, on new charges, defendant was convicted of two counts of second degree sodomy and sentenced to consecutive 3 1/2-to-7-year terms. Accordingly, based on this conviction, defendant's two terms of probation were revoked and the trial court imposed the instant sentence of concurrent terms of imprisonment of 2 1/3 to 7 and 1 to 3 years.
However, this court reversed defendant's 1986 sodomy convictions and ordered a new trial ( 132 A.D.2d 225). Upon retrial, defendant was convicted of only one count of sodomy in the second degree (Tonetti, J.) on March 31, 1989. While defendant's sentencing on this sodomy charge was adjourned until August 1989, the court indicated on the record that it would impose the minimum sentence of 2 to 4 years.
This represents a significant change of circumstances, which, under the unique facts of this case, warrants a reduction in defendant's sentence for the violation of probation. When the court originally imposed the maximum 2 1/3-to-7-year sentence for violation of probation, it took into account that defendant had been convicted, after jury trial, of two counts of sodomy in the second degree and was facing consecutive 3 1/2-to-7-year terms. After the reversal of the conviction by this court and the subsequent retrial, defendant was acquitted of one of these charges and stands convicted of only one count of sodomy for which the minimum sentence will be imposed. In light of this change in circumstances, the sentence for violation of probation should be reduced to comport with the sentence for the new felony conviction. Accordingly, we reduce the sentence for the violation of probation to 1 1/3 to 4 years.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Kassal, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.