From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baez-Caban

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2023
221 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. 1044 Ind No. 01972/16 Case No. 2017-2069

11-16-2023

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos Baez-Caban, Defendant-Appellant.

Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Whitney Robinson of counsel), for appellant. Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Conor E. Byrnes of counsel), for respondent.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Whitney Robinson of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Conor E. Byrnes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Renwick, P.J., Kern, Gesmer, Shulman, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered November 29, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of four counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree and four counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 1½ to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress his statement and physical evidence as fruits of unlawful police conduct. The officers had a founded suspicion of criminality, warranting their inquiry into whether the backpack defendant was carrying belonged to him, based on a combination of factors, including an increase of thefts of unattended bags from the nearby sports fields, defendant's known history of stealing bags from the fields, and their observation of defendant running away from a field with a backpack on his shoulder (see People v Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 184-185 [1992]; People v De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 215-216 [1976]). The officers' following of defendant in their vehicle prior to the stop did not constitute a pursuit, requiring reasonable suspicion that a crime had been or was being committed (see People v Thornton, 238 A.D.2d 33, 36 [1st Dept 1998]). Because defendant was not "seized" at the time of the inquiry, Miranda warnings were not required (see People v Townsend, 202 A.D.3d 447, 448 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 954 [2022]; People v Clarke, 157 A.D.3d 616, 616 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1080 [2018]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Baez-Caban

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2023
221 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Baez-Caban

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos Baez-Caban…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 2023

Citations

221 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5793
199 N.Y.S.3d 484