Opinion
October 1, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.).
The court appropriately exercised its discretion in denying defendant's application for dismissal of the jury panel. The remarks made by the discharged venireperson neither suggested defendant's involvement in the crime charged nor presented any potential for substantial prejudice to defendant ( see, People v. Ali, 241 A.D.2d 321, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 1009).
Defendant's right to present a defense was not improperly limited by the court. Rather, the court afforded considerable latitude in cross-examination of the People's witnesses regarding the victim's involvement with drugs and the possible motive of individuals other than defendant to have shot the deceased, and properly exercised its discretion in sustaining objections based upon considerations of hearsay and relevance ( People v. Trinidad, 177 A.D.2d 286, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 865).
Defendant did not preserve his current claims of error regarding comments of the prosecutor during summation and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find the comments to be proper.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.