From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ayala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1986
118 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

March 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.).


Judgment reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered.

The trial court erred in striking the defense character witness's testimony. The rule regarding reputation evidence is that "a reputation at any time after a charge published, or other controversy begun, is not admissible" (5 Wigmore, Evidence § 1618 [Chadbourn rev 1974]). The trial court's decision to strike the character witness's testimony on the ground that the witness had no conversations prior to the defendant's arrest which related to the defendant's character was based upon a misapplication of that rule. Although the testimony at issue was to the effect that there were no conversations prior to the arrest, the substance of the subsequent conversations was evidence of the defendant's reputation prior to the arrest.

The court's error in striking the testimony cannot be deemed harmless. "[T]he reputation of an accused for traits which, in the common experience of mankind, would tend to make it unlikely that he committed a particular offense may in and of itself give rise to a reasonable doubt of guilt where none would otherwise exist" (People v. Bouton, 50 N.Y.2d 130, 139). Since the evidence against the defendant was not overwhelming, the matter must be remitted for a new trial. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ayala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1986
118 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Ayala

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ABIMAEL AYALA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1986

Citations

118 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Khuong Dinh Pham

At the time the crime was committed, he was 18 years old and he had, among other problems, been involved with…

People v. Aharonowicz

without saying that a defendant in a criminal prosecution may introduce evidence that his character is such…