Opinion
Gen. No. 43,343. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed April 19, 1945 Released for publication May 2, 1945
PROSTITUTION AND PANDERING, § 3 — sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction. In prosecution for pandering, where uncontradicted evidence led but to one conclusion, namely, that the two defendants were panderers, seeking to ply their trade through the prosecuting witness, trial court was warranted under the evidence in finding them guilty, although testimony of prosecuting witness was contradicted in part by testimony of both defendants and another witness.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. IRWIN CLORFENE, Judge, presiding.
Judgment affirmed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the February term, 1945.
Charles A. Bellows, for plaintiff in error; William J. Tuohy, State's Attorney, for defendant in error;
Edward E. Wilson, John T. Gallagher, Melvin S. Rembe, Joseph A. Pope and C.D. Pemberton, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel.
Not to be published in full. Opinion filed April 19, 1945; released for publication May 2, 1945.