Opinion
April 6, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Potoker, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).
The defendant's contention that his pleas should be vacated and his sentences set aside because he did not receive a psychiatric examination is without merit. There was no proper basis for questioning his sanity (see, People v Armlin, 37 N.Y.2d 167).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se brief, and have found them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.