People v. Engelbrecht (1992), 225 Ill. App.3d 550, 556. The trial court relied on People v. Aultman (1992), 237 Ill. App.3d 304, when it concluded that it would have been futile for the officer to have read the "Warning to Motorist." However, Aultman is distinguishable because in that case the officer twice attempted to read the warning over the defendant's screaming.
"The statutory summary suspension procedures were enacted primarily to protect highway travellers and to evaluate whether motor vehicle drivers are intoxicated." People v. Aultman, 237 Ill. App. 3d 304, 307, 604 N.E.2d 416, 419 (1992). Courts liberally construe section 11-501.1 of the Vehicle Code ( 625 ILCS 5/11-501.1 (West 2002)) to accomplish its purpose of quickly removing impaired drivers from our highways.