Opinion
January 22, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was convicted of burglarizing the second-floor apartment of a three-family house in East Flatbush during the morning of December 19, 1986.
Contrary to the defendant's argument, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in ruling, after a Sandoval hearing, that the People could inquire into the underlying facts of the defendant's two youthful offender adjudications, both of which involved robberies committed in 1983 (see, People v. Duffy, 36 N.Y.2d 258, 264, cert denied 423 U.S. 861; People v. Wendel, 123 A.D.2d 410).
We have reviewed the defendant's remaining arguments and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v. Charles, 111 A.D.2d 405; People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.