Opinion
(Ind. No. 15739/91)
Submitted June 28, 2001.
August 20, 2001.
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered March 27, 1998, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted assault in the second degree.
Elaine McKnight, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.
Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for City of New York Department of Probation.
Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to appeal from the original judgment. Thus, his contentions concerning the original judgment are not properly before this court on his appeal from the amended judgment, which revoked the sentence of probation previously imposed and imposed a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction (see, CPL 450.30; People v. Riddick, 269 A.D.2d 472; People v. Moore, 261 A.D.2d 421).
The Supreme Court properly revoked the defendant's sentence of probation. "Commission of an additional offense * * * after imposition of a sentence of probation * * * and prior to expiration or termination of the period of sentence, constitutes a ground for revocation of such sentence" (CPL 410.10).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.