From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Atwood

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 8, 2016
499 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 152142. COA No. 326912.

03-08-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jeffery Andrew ATWOOD, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Muskegon Circuit Court for the appointment of substitute appellate counsel, in light of Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605, 125 S.Ct. 2582, 162 L.Ed.2d 552 (2005). Based on our review of the record, after the circuit court granted original appointed appellate counsel's motion to withdraw, it erred in failing to appoint substitute appellate counsel when the defendant's original appellate counsel did not accompany his motion to withdraw with legal analysis “referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal,” and the trial court failed to make a finding whether the “case is wholly frivolous.” Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); see also MCR 7.211(C)(5) and AO 2004–6, Standard 5. On remand, substitute appellate counsel, once appointed, may file an application for leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the circuit court, within six months of the date of the circuit court's order appointing counsel. The motion to reissue judgment and appoint counsel is DENIED as moot.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Atwood

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 8, 2016
499 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Atwood

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jeffery Andrew…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2016)
875 N.W.2d 200

Citing Cases

Burrell v. Jackson

Burrell is not entitled to equitable tolling. Though he does not cast his argument in terms of equitable…