Opinion
June 20, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kuffner, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the court's charge on accomplice liability was erroneous is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467). In any event, the charge was proper (see, People v Compitiello, 118 A.D.2d 720, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 941).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's other contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Weinstein, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.