From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Atkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2018
164 A.D.3d 1572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

108874

09-27-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Naomi ATKINSON, Appellant.

Richard V. Manning, Parishville, for appellant. Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.


Richard V. Manning, Parishville, for appellant.

Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Richards, J.), rendered June 29, 2016, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

In full satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and waived the right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to the agreed-upon prison term of seven years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant's contention, the record reflects that she validly waived the right to appeal. County Court distinguished the waiver of appeal from the trial-related rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea, and defendant affirmed her understanding thereof. Defendant also executed a written waiver in open court, which specifically waived any right to argue that the sentence is harsh and excessive, after acknowledging that she had an opportunity to discuss the waiver with counsel and that she understood its contents. Accordingly, we conclude that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal (see People v. Royal , 161 A.D.3d 1217, 1218, 77 N.Y.S.3d 181 [2018] ; People v. Dobbs , 157 A.D.3d 1122, 1122–1123, 68 N.Y.S.3d 781 [2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 983, 77 N.Y.S.3d 661, 102 N.E.3d 438 [2018] ). Given defendant's valid appeal waiver, her challenge to the sentence as harsh and excessive is precluded (see People v. White , 156 A.D.3d 1249, 1249–1250, 65 N.Y.S.3d 812 [2017], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 988, 77 N.Y.S.3d 665, 102 N.E.3d 442 [2018] ; People v. Williams, 155 A.D.3d 1253, 1254, 64 N.Y.S.3d 742 [2017], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1089, 79 N.Y.S.3d 111, 103 N.E.3d 1258 [2018] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Atkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department
Sep 27, 2018
164 A.D.3d 1572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Atkinson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NAOMI ATKINSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 27, 2018

Citations

164 A.D.3d 1572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
164 A.D.3d 1572
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 6295

Citing Cases

People v. Kindred

In addition, defendant executed a written appeal waiver in open court after discussing the waiver with his…