Opinion
A144487
11-18-2019
In re A.S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A.S., Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. SJ14024003)
On March 16. 2016, this court issued an opinion upholding a term of then 19-year-old A.S.'s probation that required A.S. to submit to a search of her electronics, including passwords, at the request of a probation officer or peace officer. Review was granted by the California Supreme Court "pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in In re Ricardo P." On September 26, 2019, the California Supreme Court transferred this case to this court with directions to vacate its decision and reconsider the cause in light of In re Ricardo P. (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1113. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).) In response to our inquiry regarding whether passage of time has rendered the probation condition moot, the Deputy Attorney General assigned to this case advised this court that she had contacted "the juvenile division of the district attorney's office and was informed by personnel that appellant's case is closed, the file is no longer in their office, and appellant's name is not in the court's system." A.S.'s counsel of record was given an opportunity to respond but has not done so. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
/s/_________
POLLAK, P. J. WE CONCUR: /s/_________
TUCHER, J. /s/_________
BROWN, J.