From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Artuz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 29, 1999

October 18, 1999

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.).


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Habeas corpus relief is not available to the appellant because he failed to establish that the granting of the writ would result in his immediate release (see, People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of Correction of City of N.Y., 60 N.Y.2d 648; People ex rel. Brettschneider v. Warden of Dept. of Correction of City of N.Y., 253 A.D.2d 729).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

JOY, J.P., FRIEDMANN, SCHMIDT, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Artuz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Artuz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. ALBERT RUSSELL, appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER ARTUZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 302

Citing Cases

People v. Schriro

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant has failed to establish…

People ex rel. Napoli v. Annucci

Habeas corpus will lie only when the petitioner is entitled to immediate release (see People ex rel. Kaplan…