From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Artist

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 14, 2000
95 N.Y.2d 944 (N.Y. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 15, 2000.

Decided December 14, 2000.

APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered March 2, 2000, which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court (William Wetzel, J.), rendered in New York County upon a verdict convicting defendant of manslaughter in the second degree.

Joseph M. Nursey, for appellant.

Deborah L. Morse, for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The record demonstrates that defendant's argument, that he was denied his right to a jury trial and due process as a result of the substitution of the Trial Judge during jury deliberations, is unpreserved (see, People v Tonge, 93 N.Y.2d 838, 839-840; People v Thompson, 90 N.Y.2d 615, 621). Defendant's argument that the substitute judge failed to exercise her discretion in ruling that the jury could not be released from sequestration is similarly unpreserved (see, People v Shaw, 90 N.Y.2d 879, 880).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Artist

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 14, 2000
95 N.Y.2d 944 (N.Y. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Artist

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE C., RESPONDENT, v. PHILIP MALACHI ARTIST, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2000

Citations

95 N.Y.2d 944 (N.Y. 2000)
722 N.Y.S.2d 465
745 N.E.2d 384

Citing Cases

People v. Morales

The challenged remarks were either fair comment on the evidence (seePeople v. Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105, 109, 383…