From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Arokium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 2006
33 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 9294.

October 19, 2006.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered June 3, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


The court properly denied the Mapp/Dunaway branch of defendant's suppression motion without a hearing. Defendant's assertions of innocent conduct at the time of his arrest, and his general denial of "the allegations in the accusatory instrument" failed to either controvert the specific information that was provided by the People concerning the prior criminal activity that formed the predicate for his arrest, or to provide any other basis for suppression ( see People v Jones, 95 NY2d 721; People v Soto, 284 AD2d 158, lv denied 96 NY2d 924; see also People v Lopez, 5 NY3d 753; compare People v Hightower, 85 NY2d 988).


Summaries of

People v. Arokium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 2006
33 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Arokium

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES AROKIUM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 19, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7568
822 N.Y.S.2d 442

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Defendant's motion papers, which simply allege that at the time in question he "had not been engaged in any…

People v. Singleton

" ( Hill Affirmation 9/9/09, ¶¶ 31 and 32) Defendant's claim that he was doing nothing unlawful the time of…