From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Arnold

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2013
110 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-2

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Desmond ARNOLD, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Seth M. Lieberman of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Seth M. Lieberman of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), all imposed September 25, 2008, on the ground that the sentences are excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The sentences imposed were not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., SKELOS, ROMAN, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Arnold

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2013
110 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Desmond ARNOLD, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 2, 2013

Citations

110 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6374
971 N.Y.S.2d 884