From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 2006
26 A.D.3d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2002-01573.

February 7, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered January 18, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Corsí of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel; Michelle Williams on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court failed to adequately address his claim that a juror had slept through the first day of testimony is not preserved for appellate review ( see People v. Hicks, 6 NY3d 737; People v. Gonzalez, 247 AD2d 328, 329). We decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to address the claim ( see CPL 470.15 [a]).


Summaries of

People v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 2006
26 A.D.3d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYQUAN ARMSTRONG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 339 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 997
807 N.Y.S.2d 881

Citing Cases

State of N.Y. v. Noel

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention…