From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Arias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 14, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.).


Defendant failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the statement of his codefendant was admissible as a declaration against penal interest, since the portion of the statement exculpating defendant was clearly not against the codefendant's penal interest and was otherwise unreliable ( People v. Settles, 46 N.Y.2d 154, 167). Defendants' remaining arguments regarding this evidence are without merit.

Defendant's challenge to the court's charge regarding reasonable doubt is unpreserved and, in any event, without merit since the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standard ( see, People v. Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247, 252).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Arias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1997
243 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Arias

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE ARIAS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 309 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 522

Citing Cases

People v. Smyre

We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in refusing to admit in evidence a statement of a…

People v. Smyre

We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in refusing to admit in evidence a statement of a…