Opinion
July 8, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to defendant's contention, the record does not reveal a "tacit understanding" between the prosecutor and the defendant's accomplice to reduce the accomplice's sentence in exchange for testifying against the defendant ( see, People v Cwikla, 46 N.Y.2d 434). The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit or do not require reversal. Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.