From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Arenas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to defendant's contention, the record does not reveal a "tacit understanding" between the prosecutor and the defendant's accomplice to reduce the accomplice's sentence in exchange for testifying against the defendant ( see, People v Cwikla, 46 N.Y.2d 434). The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit or do not require reversal. Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Arenas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Arenas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIGUEL ARENAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 900