From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 2006
34 A.D.3d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

9534.

November 14, 2006.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert G. Seewald, J.), rendered February 7, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Tom, J.P. Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.


The court properly found defendant competent to stand trial following a hearing. The court properly weighed the conflicting psychiatric reports and testimony, as well as its own observations of defendant, in concluding that the People had proven defendant's competence by a preponderance of the evidence ( see People v Mendez, 1 NY3d 15, 20). There was clear evidence from two psychiatrists that defendant was able to understand the facts of the case, the charges against him and the roles of the various participants in the court proceedings ( see People v Shiffer, 256 AD2d 818, 819, lv denied 93 NY2d 878), and defendant's own psychologist partially supported these conclusions. There was also strong evidence of defendant's exaggeration or feigning of symptoms, such as his ability to interact appropriately with other patients when the doctors were not around and the nursing staff was reduced, the fact that he never discussed his symptoms except in the context of his criminal case, and indications that he was fabricating hallucinations.


Summaries of

People v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 14, 2006
34 A.D.3d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Aponte

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN APONTE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 14, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8184
823 N.Y.S.2d 406

Citing Cases

People v. Stoneham

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant…

People v. Jones

Conflicting testimony was presented at the hearing with respect to defendant's competency, and the court's…