Opinion
2d Juv. No. B275971
02-28-2017
In re ANTONIO H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTONIO H., Defendant and Appellant.
Miriam R. Arichea, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Respondent.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5. (Super. Ct. No. 1487561)
(Santa Barbara County)
Antonio H. appeals from a judgment entered after the juvenile court sustained a petition for shoplifting. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602, subd (a); Pen. Code, § 459.5, subd. (a).) Appellant was continued a ward of the court and was ordered, among other things, to perform 30 hours of community service work and pay a $50 restitution fine (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 730.6).
We appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On December 13, 2016, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to consider. No response has been received from appellant.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, J. We concur:
GILBERT, P. J.
PERREN, J.
Thomas R. Adams, Judge
Superior Court County of Santa Barbara
Miriam R. Arichea, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance by Respondent.