People v. Anthony Judge

Full title: THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY JUDGE, Defendant and…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division

Date published: Apr 1, 2010

No. D054342 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 1, 2010)

Opinion

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY JUDGE, Defendant and Appellant. D054342 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, First Division April 1, 2010

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. MH102101

NARES, Acting P. J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 24, 2010, be modified as follows:

1. In the Disposion, on page 21, the words "the Attorney General" are changed to "the People" so the Disposition reads:

The case is remanded to the trial court to determine whether the People can demonstrate the constitutional justification for imposing on SVP's a greater burden than is imposed on MDO's and NGI's in order to obtaIn release from commitment. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

There is no change in the judgment.

Copies to: All parties