From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Anglim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1992
186 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

September 28, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Anglim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1992
186 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Anglim

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL ANGLIM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

In re Burton

On the other hand, there is good authority to sustain the proposition that, if sufficient cause exists…