From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Angelis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 10, 2012
94 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-10

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. John ANGELIS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Daniel Bresnahan, and Matthew Sweet of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Daniel Bresnahan, and Matthew Sweet of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), both imposed January 19, 2011, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid ( see People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108; People v. Bradshaw, 76 A.D.3d 566, 568–569, 906 N.Y.S.2d 93), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

MASTRO, A.P.J., SKELOS, LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Angelis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 10, 2012
94 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Angelis

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. John ANGELIS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 10, 2012

Citations

94 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
941 N.Y.S.2d 862
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2701

Citing Cases

People v. Quezada

Here, although the defendant executed a written waiver of his right to appeal, the defendant's understanding…

People v. Quezada

Here, although the defendant executed a written waiver of his right to appeal, the defendant's understanding…