From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Andriani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1980
73 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

January 15, 1980


Judgments of conviction, rendered May 12, 1978, Supreme Court, New York County, are affirmed. We have heretofore held this appeal in abeyance and remitted the matter "for the reopening and continuance of the pretrial hearing on the subject of identification of [these] defendants-appellants * * * by the witness Febee, to make new findings of fact and conclusions of law, and a new determination" (People v. Andriani, 67 A.D.2d 20, 26). The reopened hearing has been held, including, by stipulation, all previous relevant trial testimony. The Trial Justice, by order of September 8, 1979, has denied the reopened motion to suppress Febee's identification of defendants-appellants, and we sustain his findings and conclusions for the reasons set forth in his order and decision. So much for the points raised as to unreliability of Febee as an identification witness as to both defendants. As to other specific points in the supplemental briefs in behalf of appellants, we rule separately as to each. Both appellants attack the use of a curtain at the lineup, as described in our earlier writing at page 23. ( 67 A.D.2d 20, 23, supra.) We hold this particular concealment of identity of a lineup witness not to have violated appellants' rights since such a concealed witness, though unknown at the time of the viewing, may be — indeed, now has been — questioned both at a hearing and at trial. (See United States v. Tolliver, 569 F.2d 724, 728.) The method used has been characterized as "not a mode to be followed" (People v Andriani, 67 A.D.2d 20, 23, supra), and is fraught with possibilities of irreparable error, but it did no harm in this case. And the defendants' right to counsel was not violated since counsel did actually, save for identity of the witness, have the opportunity otherwise to observe. And the photographic array shown to Febee was not impermissibly suggestive. We do not consider that Doyle's photo was taken while he was illegally detained. All other points raised have been covered in our prior rulings, to which we adhere.

Concur — Silverman, J.P., Fein and Markewich, JJ.


I would reverse Doyle's conviction and dismiss the indictment as to him for the reasons I previously set forth in People v. Andriani ( 67 A.D.2d 20, 26).


Summaries of

People v. Andriani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1980
73 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Andriani

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANDRIANI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1980

Citations

73 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Febee v. City of New York

(See People v. Andriani, 67 A.D.2d 20, cert den sub nom. Boutureira v. New York, 444 U.S. 866; People v.…