From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 18, 1973
42 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

October 18, 1973


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered March 8, 1973, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of assault in the second degree. Defendant was a passenger in an automobile owned by his wife and operated by a female companion on Route 7 in Albany County, at about 3:45 A.M. on October 7, 1972, when the driver was stopped by two State Troopers and requested to produce her license. Upon her failure to do so, defendant was arrested for permitting unlicensed operation of a vehicle. The ensuing conversation advanced to an altercation which required hospital treatment for defendant and both troopers. On October 19, 1972 defendant was indicted for two counts of assault in the second degree, and thereafter he was found guilty on both counts, and sentenced to a five-year term of imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Prior to trial, however, defendant challenged the jury panel (CPL 270.10) on the ground that black persons, and other distinct classes of which defendant was a member, had been systematically excluded from the panel. After a hearing, the trial court denied the challenge. Although the hearing showed certain irregularities in the system as it functioned in Albany County, there was insufficient proof of systematic exclusion of blacks and others from jury service. A witness for defendant admitted that he had no personal knowledge of systematic exclusion of potential black jurors. From an examination of this record, it is evident that defendant has failed to meet the required burden of proof in that he has not shown that a distinct attitudinal class of persons was systematically excluded or that he was prejudiced in any manner by the panel that was drawn ( People v. Chestnut, 26 N.Y.2d 481, 487; People v. McDowell, 35 A.D.2d 611, mod. on other grounds 28 N.Y.2d 373; People v. Pulliam, 28 A.D.2d 786). The other grounds for reversal urged by defendant have no basis in fact or law. Judgment affirmed. Greenblott, J.P., Cooke, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 18, 1973
42 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

People v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALLEN M. ANDERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 1007 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

People v. Sibila

Counsel stipulated that 54% of the eligible jurors in the county are women, that of the 70,000 jury notices…

Anderson v. Casscles

An appeal was taken to the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court, which affirmed the judgment of…