From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Amell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 18, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-09-18

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brian AMELL, Appellant.

Michael C. Ross, Bloomingburg, for appellant, and appellant pro se. D. Holley, Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.


Michael C. Ross, Bloomingburg, for appellant, and appellant pro se. D. Holley, Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (McGinty, J.), rendered April 23, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Defendant thereafter was sentenced as a second felonyoffender to the agreed-upon prison term of seven years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, counsel's brief and defendant's pro se submission, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted ( see People v. Jennings, 117 A.D.3d 1281, 986 N.Y.S.2d 879 [2014]; People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv. denied67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).

We note, however, that although defendant was properly sentenced as a second violent felony offender, the uniform sentence and commitment form incorrectly contains a notation indicating that he was sentenced as a second felony offender. “While this error does not require that an otherwise legal sentence be vacated, the uniform sentence and commitment form must be amended accordingly” (People v. Washington, 117 A.D.3d 1279, 1280, 986 N.Y.S.2d 273 [2014] [citations omitted] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, application to be relieved of assignment granted, and matter remitted for entry of an amended uniform sentence and commitment form. PETERS, P.J., STEIN, GARRY, EGAN JR. and LYNCH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Amell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 18, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Amell

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brian AMELL, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 18, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 1491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
120 A.D.3d 1491
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6222

Citing Cases

People v. Martin

The uniform sentence and commitment form, however, incorrectly bears a notation that defendant was sentenced…