Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

People v. A.M. (In re D.M.)

No. 1-20-0103 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
People v. A.M. (In re D.M.)

8 Citing cases

  1. People v. Savannah M. (In re B.S.)

    2024 Ill. App. 231701 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024)

    Whether to grant a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and we will not overturn that decision absent an abuse of that discretion. In re D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 20. A court abuses its discretion in denying a continuance when it acts arbitrarily or unreasonably.

  2. People v. Suastegui-Ramirez

    2024 Ill. App. 230299 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024)

    But just because counsel's argument could have been better does not mean that counsel was ineffective. See Interest of D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 35. Additionally, the trial court was already aware of most of these factors.

  3. People v. Tiffany L. (In re M.R.)

    2024 Ill. App. 4th 240941 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024)

    Nonetheless, even though counsel was not present, the results in this case would not have been any different. See In re D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 30. "The prejudice prong of the Strickland analysis requires a reasonable probability, not just a mere possibility, of a different outcome." Id.

  4. People v. Annie M. (In re C.A.)

    2024 Ill. App. 231554 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024)

    A trial court abuses its discretion when it makes "a ruling that is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, or when no reasonable person would take the same view." In re D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 20.

  5. People v. C.M. (In re J.A.)

    2023 Ill. App. 230198 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023)   Cited 1 times

    Cronic expressly applies in the criminal context, but this court has declined to expand its holding to termination of parental rights proceedings. See In re C.C., 368 Ill.App.3d 744, 748 (2006); In re D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 31. Therefore, we must reject the mother's argument that prejudice is presumed here.

  6. People v. Mohammed A. (In re A.A.)

    2022 Ill. App. 3d 220248 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022)

    Procedural due process requires that respondent: (1) receive notice of the proceedings; and (2) have an opportunity to be heard. In re D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 39 (citing In re D.P., 319 Ill.App.3d 554, 558 (2001)). The record conclusively establishes that respondent received notice of the proceedings as he was informed by the caseworker and was served with summons. Approximately one year into the case, respondent appeared for a hearing.

  7. People v. N.R. (In re T.J.)

    2021 Ill. App. 210740 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021)   Cited 2 times

    An abuse of discretion occurs if the ruling is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable. In re D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 20. The denial of a request for a continuance will be grounds for a reversal only "where the complaining party has been prejudiced by the denial."

  8. In re K.C.

    2021 Ill. App. 210305 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021)   Cited 3 times

    An abuse of discretion occurs if the ruling is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable. In re D.M., 2020 IL App (1st) 200103, ¶ 20. The denial of a request for a continuance will be grounds for a reversal only "where the complaining party has been prejudiced by the denial."