From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alvarez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-11

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Abner ALVAREZ, appellant.


Jane M. Bloom, Rock Hill, N.Y., for appellant.Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Robert H. Middlemiss and Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Freehill, J.), rendered December 16, 2008, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support his convictions is unpreserved for appellate review, as defense counsel merely made a general motion for a trial order of dismissal at the close of the People's case ( see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 491–492, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946; People v. Devers, 82 A.D.3d 1261, 920 N.Y.S.2d 177). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review of the evidence pursuant to CPL 470.15(5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902).

The defendant's contention that certain evidence of gang membership was erroneously admitted at trial is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05[2] ). In any event, any error in admitting such evidence was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt and no significant probability that the alleged error contributed to his conviction ( see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241–242, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E.2d 787). Further, the defendant failed to establish that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel ( see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687–694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674;

People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584).

RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Alvarez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Alvarez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Abner ALVAREZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
930 N.Y.S.2d 890
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7231

Citing Cases

People v. Alvarez

Judge: , J. Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 88 AD3d 807 (Orange)…

Alvarez v. Kirkpatrick

On October 11, 2011, the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the conviction. People v. Alvarez,…