From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alvarado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1993
193 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 24, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was induced to plead guilty by the threat of a heavier sentence if he went to trial. We find this contention to be without merit, as a review of the record reveals that the defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see generally, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). The defendant's remaining contention is also without merit (see, People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v Mitchell, 176 A.D.2d 967). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, O'Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Alvarado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1993
193 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Alvarado

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY ALVARADO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 997

Citing Cases

People v. Tissiera

To the contrary, the defendant's responses at the plea and sentencing proceedings were appropriate and did…

People v. Tissiera

Under these circumstances, the County Court was not required, sua sponte, to direct a competency examination…