From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alonzo

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Four.
Nov 20, 2003
B166848 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2003)

Opinion

B166848.

11-20-2003

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID ALONZO, Defendant and Appellant.

Jonathan B. Steiner, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Appellant David Alonzo was found guilty by a jury of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211.) Sentenced to prison for three years, he appeals.

After review of the record, appellants court-appointed counsel filed an opening brief requesting this court to independently review the record pursuant to the holding of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.

On August 26, 2003, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that no arguable issues exist, and that appellant has, by virtue of counsels compliance with the Wende procedure and our review of the record, received adequate and effective appellate review of the judgment entered against him in this case. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: VOGEL (C.S.), P.J., HASTINGS, J.


Summaries of

People v. Alonzo

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Four.
Nov 20, 2003
B166848 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2003)
Case details for

People v. Alonzo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID ALONZO, Defendant and…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Four.

Date published: Nov 20, 2003

Citations

B166848 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2003)