From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Allred

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 29, 2000
270 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 29, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Contiguglia, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., WISNER, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant contends that he did not receive timely notice of his right to testify before the Grand Jury. He concedes, however, that he waived his right to appeal as part of his plea of guilty, and that waiver encompasses his contentions ( see generally, People v. Moissett , 76 N.Y.2d 909, 910-911). In any event, by pleading guilty, defendant "removed this issue from the case and, lacking express statutory authorization, he cannot resuscitate it on appeal" ( People v. Taylor , 65 N.Y.2d 1, 7; see, People v. Holt , 210 A.D.2d 994, 995). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Allred

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 29, 2000
270 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Allred

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBIN ALLRED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 29, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 656

Citing Cases

People v. Mitchell

The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal as part of his plea of guilty encompasses his contention…

People v. Lighthall

The denial of an opportunity to testify before the grand jury, however, does not "call into question the…