From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ali

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 16, 2023
216 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

241 Ind. No. 730/16 Case No. 2019-4936

05-16-2023

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rahim ALI, Defendant–Appellant.

Rosenberg Law Firm, Brooklyn (Jonathan Rosenberg of counsel), for appellant. Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jennifer Covais of counsel), for respondent.


Rosenberg Law Firm, Brooklyn (Jonathan Rosenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jennifer Covais of counsel), for respondent.

Kern, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Moulton, Rodriguez, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered February 9, 2018, as amended February 22, 2018, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a firearm, and menacing in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant's claim that the verdict convicting him of attempted assault in the first degree was based on legally insufficient evidence or against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). Defendant's intent to at least cause serious physical injury could be readily inferred from his actions in aiming and firing at the victim (see generally People v. Getch, 50 N.Y.2d 456, 465, 429 N.Y.S.2d 579, 407 N.E.2d 425 [1980] ),

Defendant's claim that the first-degree attempted assault count was duplicitous is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. There was no requirement that the indictment specifically identify the person defendant intended to shoot (see People v. Wells, 7 N.Y.3d 51, 57, 817 N.Y.S.2d 590, 850 N.E.2d 637 [2006] ). In any event, the identity of the intended target was clear, notwithstanding that defendant also menaced another person during the incident.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Ali

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 16, 2023
216 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Ali

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rahim ALI…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

216 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
216 A.D.3d 516

Citing Cases

People v. Artis

Disposition: Applications for Criminal Leave to appeal denied Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 216 A.D.3d…

People v. Ali

Disposition: Applications for Criminal Leave to appeal denied Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 216 A.D.3d…