From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2001.

April 2, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barbaro, J.), rendered May 3, 1999, convicting him of assault in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, menacing in the second degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kelli D. Lofton of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Lori Glachman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the procedure used by the Supreme Court to dismiss a sworn juror and therefore that issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; see, also, People v. Starks, 248 A.D.2d 1003; People v. Schenck, 209 A.D.2d 453; People v. Ricciardi, 199 A.D.2d 432). The defendant's failure to object deprived this court of a record on which we could exercise intelligent judicial review of his contentions (see, People v. Camacho, 90 N.Y.2d 558; People v. Kinchen, 60 N.Y.2d 772; People v. Thompson, 262 A.D.2d 666). We decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.15).


Summaries of

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. DAVID ALEXANDER, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 2, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 417

Citing Cases

People v. Toussaint

However, the defendant made no objection prior to the discharge of the jurors, nor did he request that any…

People v. Lausane

The issue the defendant raises on appeal is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object to the…