From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1998
256 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 7, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant waived his right to appeal and cannot use CPL 440.10 as a substitute for an appeal (see, People v. Hill, 220 A.D.2d 905). In any event, he failed to present any evidence either of mitigating circumstances or that he was a minor participant in the crime. Therefore, he was not entitled to youthful offender treatment (see, People v. Cuatle, 212 A.D.2d 625).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Pizzuto, J.P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1998
256 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. LEE ALEXANDER, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 349 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 357

Citing Cases

People v. Flocker

Thus, the defendant had a full opportunity to raise them on appeal and his failure to do so is unjustified. A…

People v. Williams

10 See People v. Cooks, 67 N.Y.2d 100, 103 (1986) (A motion to vacate a judgment of conviction cannot be…