From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of Michigan
May 18, 2022
No. 360035 (Mich. Ct. App. May. 18, 2022)

Opinion

360035

05-18-2022

People of Michigan v. John Allen Alexander


LC No. 11-001669-01-FH

Christopher M. Murray Presiding Judge, Anica Letica Judge

ORDER

Kristina Robinson Garrett Judge

The motion to waive fees is GRANTED for this case only.

The motion for peremptory reversal pursuant to MCR 7.211(C)(4) is DENIED for failure to persuade the Court of the existence of manifest error requiring reversal and warranting peremptory relief without argument or formal submission.

The delayed application for leave to appeal is DENIED for lack of merit in the grounds presented. As the trial court explained, defendant had no pending motion for relief from judgment to supplement or amend at the time he filed a motion under MCR 6.502(F). Thus, the motion was improper. However, we note that after his motion to amend or supplement was denied, defendant attempted to file a successive motion for relief from judgment, which was returned without filing by the trial court on January 7, 2022. Effective May 1, 2021, the former procedure of MCR 6.502(G)(1) allowing a trial court to return successive motions for relief from judgment without filing was eliminated. See ADM File 2019-35. Trial courts are now required to enter an order disposing of successive motions for relief from judgment. MCR 6.502(G). We leave it to the trial court to determine how to address its error in returning defendant's successive motion for relief from judgment without filing.


Summaries of

People v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of Michigan
May 18, 2022
No. 360035 (Mich. Ct. App. May. 18, 2022)
Case details for

People v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:People of Michigan v. John Allen Alexander

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: May 18, 2022

Citations

No. 360035 (Mich. Ct. App. May. 18, 2022)