Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Santa Clara County Super.Ct.No. FF825195
Duffy, J.
Rick Paul Alexander, the defendant herein, pleaded guilty to possessing heroin (see Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)), methamphetamine (see id., § 11377, subd. (a)), and a hypodermic needle or syringe (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 4140). He admitted an allegation that he was a second-strike offender under the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12). The trial court accepted the plea and entered judgment against defendant on all three offenses. The heroin offense was a felony, but the other two were misdemeanors. The court sentenced defendant to 32 months in state prison (the low term doubled pursuant to defendant’s second strike offender status) for the felony. It also sentenced him to 30 days’ confinement in jail for each of the two misdemeanors, but with equal credit for time served.
Counsel for defendant has filed an opening brief that states the case and facts but raises no issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf. Defendant did not do so.
FACTS
Because defendant pleaded guilty and waived referral to the probation department for its evaluation of his circumstances, the record is bereft of facts. The parties stipulated that there was a factual basis for the plea on the basis of police reports, but we do not have them before us.
DISCUSSION
We have reviewed the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, keeping in mind that defendant did not seek a certificate of probable cause (see Pen. Code, § 1237.5) and accordingly confining our review to grounds for appeal that occurred after entry of defendant’s guilty plea and do not affect the plea’s validity (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b)(1), (b)(4)(B)). We agree with counsel for defendant that there is no arguable issue on appeal. Therefore we will affirm the judgment.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
WE CONCUR. Mihara, Acting P. J., McAdams, J.