From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1991
172 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 23, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J.).


Defendant's conviction arose out of a buy and bust operation. The undercover officer walked up to defendant and co-defendant, and asked defendant for "two nickels." The officer handed defendant ten dollars of buy money, which he gave to the co-defendant, stating "give him two." The co-defendant extracted two vials of cocaine from his own pocket, gave them to defendant, who in turn gave them to the officer. Both defendants were immediately arrested, and their identities were confirmed a few moments later in a drive-by identification. Defendant testified that he did not participate in the sale and was buying sneakers for his girlfriend in a store next to the bodega where he was arrested. Defendant's appellate contention that the court failed to submit a charge for criminal facilitation as a lesser included offense of the criminal sale charge, has been waived for review as a matter of law. Defendant did not request the court to charge criminal facilitation as a lesser included offense, and never objected to the court's failure to so charge the jury and the alleged error was not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05). In any event, criminal facilitation is not a lesser included offense of criminal sale (People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61, 63-65; see also, People v. Luther, 61 N.Y.2d 724) and any claim that the court erred by failing to charge an agency defense was similarly unpreserved. (CPL 470.05; People v. Gayles, 122 A.D.2d 222; People v Wolcott, 111 A.D.2d 513.) In any event, defendant's own testimony negates the existence of an agency defense (see generally, People v. Roche, 45 N.Y.2d 78, 83, cert denied 439 U.S. 958), insofar as he denied any participation in the drug transaction (see, People v. Argibay, 45 N.Y.2d 45, 53, cert denied sub nom. Hahn-DiGuiseppe v. New York, 439 U.S. 930; People v. Guzman, 156 A.D.2d 715, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 789).

We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1991
172 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES ALEXANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 23, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
568 N.Y.S.2d 931

Citing Cases

People v. Castro

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the Supreme Court erred by not charging…

People v. Carrion

Accordingly, the court properly exercised its discretion regarding the order of proof ( see CPL 260.30; cf.…