From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alejo

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Sep 18, 2007
No. B197054 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 18, 2007)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AUGUSTINE ALEJO, Defendant and Appellant. B197054 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Sixth Division September 18, 2007

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Superior Court County of Los Angeles, Super. Ct. No. NA069680-01, Arthur Jean, Jr., Judge.

Alan Siraco, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

GILBERT, P.J.

Augustine Alejo appeals a judgment of conviction entered after he expressly waived his constitutional rights and pleaded nolo contendere to second degree robbery, and admitted allegations of prior serious felony strike convictions and service of prior prison terms. (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 667, subd. (a), 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), & 667.5, subd. (b).) Alejo received a negotiated sentence of 16 years, consisting of a 5-year upper term for second degree robbery (doubled), a 5-year enhancement pursuant to section 667, subdivision (a), and a one-year enhancement pursuant to section 667.5, subdivision (b). The trial court awarded Alejo presentence custody credits of 282 days. It also imposed a $200 restitution fine and a $200 stayed parole revocation restitution fine. (§§ 1202.4, subd. (b) & 1202.45.) The trial court dismissed a remaining count of grand theft from a person, strike allegations, and prior prison term allegations charged in the information.

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

We appointed counsel to represent Alejo in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.

On August 1, 2007, we advised Alejo that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response from him.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Alejo's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: COFFEE, J., PERREN, J.


Summaries of

People v. Alejo

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Sep 18, 2007
No. B197054 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 18, 2007)
Case details for

People v. Alejo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AUGUSTINE ALEJO, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

No. B197054 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 18, 2007)