From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Alcantara

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 17, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-17-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard ALCANTARA, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Luis Morales of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Luis Morales of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), entered on or about December 10, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure from defendant's presumptive risk level (see generally People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). Defendant failed to meet his burden to show that his participation in sex offender treatment was so exceptional as to warrant a downward departure. The remaining mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, and were outweighed by the aggravating factors.

TOM, J.P., RICHTER, ANDRIAS, GESMER, SINGH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Alcantara

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 17, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Alcantara

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard ALCANTARA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 17, 2017

Citations

61 N.Y.S.3d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23…

People v. Seales

These infractions were neither trivial nor remote (seePeople v. Chabrier, 38 A.D.3d 355, 830 N.Y.S.2d 898…