Opinion
April 13, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court properly determined that the evidence seized from the defendant should not be suppressed. The officer who seized the evidence acted properly, pursuant to a valid stop and frisk, relying on clear and articulable facts that he was in danger (see, People v De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210; People v Watson, 96 A.D.2d 1066). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.