From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ah Dat

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1875
49 Cal. 652 (Cal. 1875)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Second Judicial District, County of Butte.

         The defendant was indicted for the murder of Ah Peu, alleged to have been committed on the 11th day of October, 1874. Ah Peu was mortally wounded by a pistol shot, and on the 14th of October, 1874, his dying declaration was taken down by a magistrate, who acted through an interpreter. This declaration charged the defendant with having fired the fatal shot. On the trial it was admitted in evidence. The defendant was convicted, and appealed.

         COUNSEL

          Jo Hamilton, for the Appellant.

         George A. Blanchard, for the People.


         JUDGES: McKinstry, J. Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.

         OPINION

          McKINSTRY, Judge

         The paper writing offered in evidence, was improperly admitted as the dying declaration of the deceased. The evidence is undisputed that immediately prior to, and at the time of the alleged declaration, the deceased stated, in effect, that if he lived two or three days, he expected or hoped to get well. It is obvious that the deceased did not believe himself in such extremity that every hope of this world was gone; he did not believe his dissolution to be actually impending.

         Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

People v. Ah Dat

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1875
49 Cal. 652 (Cal. 1875)
Case details for

People v. Ah Dat

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. AH DAT

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1875

Citations

49 Cal. 652 (Cal. 1875)

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

This Court held the ruling of the Court below error, on the ground that the words above quoted were "a clear…

People v. Crews

         The written statement of the deceased was not admissible in evidence, as it did not meet the…