Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

People v. Adams

30 Ill. App. 3d 396 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
People v. Adams

2 Citing cases

  1. People v. Carter

    344 Ill. App. 3d 663 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003)   Cited 12 times
    Noting “the absurd result” that would be reached if every round of ammunition gave rise to a separate offense

    The majority of them, like Deppert, involve the offense of unlawful use of a weapon which, again, is a different offense from the one at issue here. See, e.g., People v. Weir, 111 Ill. 2d 334 (1986); People v. Hurt, 175 Ill. App. 3d 970 (1988); People v. Cook, 129 Ill. App. 3d 531 (1984); People v. Stewart, 122 Ill. App. 3d 546 (1984); People v. Glass, 49 Ill. App. 3d 617 (1977); People v. Marbley, 34 Ill. App. 3d 434 (1975); People v. Adams, 30 Ill. App. 3d 396 (1975); People v. Rodgers, 2 Ill. App. 3d 507 (1971). Three of the cases relied upon by the dissent do not even involve a weapons offense.

  2. People v. Janis

    56 Ill. App. 3d 160 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that the presence of other men in a car did not negate the defendant's constructive possession of a concealed weapon

    The State must often prove such knowledge by circumstantial evidence. People v. Adams (1st Dist. 1975), 30 Ill. App.3d 396, 332 N.E.2d 487 (abstract). • 5 Because this was a bench trial, it was for the trial court to decide whether the State established the guilt of the defendant.