From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 8, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

We have considered the contentions raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be frivolous. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVE ADAMS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)